As you 
                    read the words on this page, you are utilizing thousands of 
                    the 100 billion (more or less) nerve cells that make up your 
                    brain. The electrical firings and chemical messages running 
                    between these cells, called neurons, are what produce our 
                    thoughts, feelings and interactions with the world around 
                    us. 
                    
                    
                  One hundred 
                    billion neurons may seem like a lot of nerve cells, but is 
                    actually only about 20% of the number we originally start 
                    with. The number of nerve cells in our brain peaks prenatally 
                    and then they start to prune themselves out, one by one, through 
                    childhood. By the time we enter adolescence, our brain has 
                    chosen the final select neurons it will keep throughout our 
                    adult life. The decision is based on which cells we use and 
                    which we do not. The cells we do not use are pruned away leaving 
                    more room to add branches, or dendrites, to the nerve cells 
                    that we do use. New branches are added as the brain receives 
                    and processes any new information. 
                    
                    
                  How does 
                    the brain actually "prune" the garden? The answer lies in 
                    a number of chemicals and their actions and reactions. The 
                    chief pruner is probably an enzyme named Calpain. Calpain 
                    has the ability to self-destruct a cell. Technically this 
                    is known as autolysis ("auto" meaning self, and "lysis" meaning 
                    to destroy). 
                    
                    
                  Calpain 
                    is produced in the nerve cells when there is a heavy calcium 
                    ion concentration in their surrounding environment. Reduced 
                    blood flow can cause this high calcium ion build up between 
                    and within cells (for you biology enthusiasts, the calcium 
                    comes from the mitochondria and the ER as well as an influx 
                    from outside the cell). In other words, high activity in a 
                    brain region calls for heavy blood flow to service the cells, 
                    low activity requires little blood flow. Therefore, the less-used 
                    areas, with their limited blood flow activity, tend to build 
                    up calcium ions. This build-up triggers the secretion of the 
                    enzyme Calpain, which causes the nerve cell to self -destruct. 
                    
                    
                    
                  New growth, 
                    on the other hand, comes in the dendrite development, or branching 
                    of well-used neurons. This branching is caused from chemicals 
                    known as Neurotrophins. Neurotrophins are a group of proteins 
                    which are responsible for the growth and development of neurons. 
                    As you may suspect, we use a lot of neurotrophins during childhood 
                    as the brain has massive growth and development. But we continue 
                    to use neurotrophins all of our lives, especially in the hippocampus 
                    area, the brain region responsible for new learning and new 
                    memory formation. 
                    
                    
                  There 
                    are many neurotrophins at work in the brain. The first one 
                    discovered is known as NGF (nerve growth factor). Others, 
                    discovered since, have equally self-explanatory names as brain 
                    derived neurotrophic factor (bFGF), and glial cell-line derived 
                    neurotropic factor (GDNF). These neurotrophins work by attaching 
                    themselves to receptor sites on nerve cells and causing the 
                    cell membrane to change shape, grow and branch. 
                    
                    
                  Because 
                    most growth hormones throughout the body are especially active 
                    during sleep, it is thought that the majority of neurotrophic 
                    work is also done during sleep, especially the non-REM cycles 
                    of sleep. The work of Marcos Frank and Michael Stryker, at 
                    UC San Francisco, caught the education world by surprise in 
                    2001 with their startling research showing the tremendous 
                    amount of branching and subsequent learning that took place 
                    during sleep. While most of the science community historically 
                    considered that the REM, or dreaming cycle of sleep was the 
                    time when most wiring took place, Stryker's work and the research 
                    following that study continue to show that it is actually 
                    the non-REM cycles that help hard wire in the information 
                    learned the previous day. 
                    
                    
                  From a 
                    practical standpoint, sleep research continues to show the 
                    importance of sleep to the learning brain. Students MUST get 
                    sufficient sleep following the learning of new information 
                    if we want that information stored in a long-term, complex 
                    network of neuron branches. 
                    
                    
                  The research 
                    on brain wiring and the biology behind it continues to be 
                    a fascinating topic. It gives hope to people with stroke damage, 
                    Alzheimer's and other neurological problems, as well as providing 
                    a better understanding for those of us who parent and teach 
                    young brains. 
                  Remember 
                    to learn something new today. . . then sleep on it. 
                    
                  
                
                References: 
                  
                
Bax, et al. (1997). Structure, 5, 
                  1275-1285. 
                
Birkbeck, et al. 1991. Nature 354: 411-414. 
                
Bothwell, M. & Rev, A. (1995). Neuroscience. 18, 223-253. 
                
Cunningham, L. et al. (1994). Brain Research, 658, 219-231. 
                
Date, I. et al. (1996). Neurosurgery, 84, 1006-1012. 
                
DiStefano, P. et al (1992). Neuron, 8, 983-993. 
                
Frank, M. & Stryker, M. 2001, April 26. Neuron. 
                
Gage, F. et al. (1988). Neurology. 269, 147-155. 
                
Kang, H., et al. (1997). Neurotrophins and time: different 
                  roles for TrkB signaling in hippocampal long-term potentiation,, 
                  Neuron, 19, 653-664. 
                
Kang, H. & Schuman, E.M. (1996). A requirement for local 
                  protein synthesis in neurotrophin-induced synaptic plasticity, 
                  Science, 273, 1402-1406. 
                
Lindholm D, et al. (1997). Neurotrophins and cerebellar development. 
                  Perspectives on Developmental Neurobiology. 5(1):83-94. 
                
Lindsay, R. et al. (1994). Neuroscience. 17, 182-190. 
                
Paschen W. & Doutheil J. (1999). Disturbances of the functioning 
                  of endoplasmic reticulum: A key mechanism underlying neuronal 
                  cell injury? Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 
                  19(1):1-18. 
                
Schweizer F. et al., (1998). Regulation of neurotransmitter 
                  release kinetics by NSF. Science. 279(5354):1203-1206. 
                
Thoenen, H. (1995). Neurotrophins and neuronal plasticity. 
                  Science 270: 593-598.